How our Brains Make Memories > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Sitting at a sidewalk café in Montreal on a sunny morning, Karim Nader recalls the day eight years earlier when two planes slammed into the twin towers of the World Commerce Middle. He lights a cigarette and waves his hands in the air to sketch the scene. On the time of the attack, Nader was a postdoctoral researcher at New York University. He flipped the radio on whereas getting able to go to work and heard the banter of the morning disc jockeys flip panicky as they related the occasions unfolding in Decrease Manhattan. Nader ran to the roof of his condominium constructing, Memory Wave where he had a view of the towers less than two miles away. He stood there, stunned, MemoryWave Official as they burned and fell, pondering to himself, "No manner, man. In the next days, Nader recalls, he handed through subway stations where partitions had been lined with notes and images left by folks searching desperately for missing cherished ones. "It was like walking upstream in a river of sorrow," he says.

Like millions of people, Nader has vivid and emotional memories of the September 11, 2001, assaults and their aftermath. But as an expert on memory, and, specifically, on the malleability of memory, he knows better than to completely trust his recollections. Most individuals have so-called flashbulb memories of where they had been and what they had been doing when one thing momentous happened: the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, say, or the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger. But as clear and detailed as these reminiscences really feel, psychologists discover they're surprisingly inaccurate. Nader, now a neuroscientist at McGill College in Montreal, says his memory of the World Commerce Middle assault has performed just a few tricks on him. He recalled seeing television footage on September eleven of the first airplane hitting the north tower of the World Commerce Heart. But he was shocked to learn that such footage aired for the first time the following day. Apparently he wasn’t alone: a 2003 study of 569 school college students found that 73 % shared this misperception.

Nader believes he could have a proof for such quirks of memory. His ideas are unconventional inside neuroscience, and they've precipitated researchers to reconsider a few of their most primary assumptions about how memory works. In brief, Nader believes that the very act of remembering can change our reminiscences. Much of his research is on rats, but he says the identical fundamental ideas apply to human memory as well. Actually, he says, it could also be unimaginable for people or every other animal to convey a memory to thoughts with out altering it indirectly. Nader thinks it’s probably that some types of memory, comparable to a flashbulb memory, are extra inclined to alter than others. Reminiscences surrounding a significant event like September 11 is perhaps particularly susceptible, he says, as a result of we tend to replay them again and again in our minds and in conversation with others-with every repetition having the potential to change them.

For these of us who cherish our reminiscences and like to suppose they are an accurate record of our historical past, the idea that memory is basically malleable is greater than slightly disturbing. Not all researchers believe Nader has proved that the means of remembering itself can alter recollections. But when he is right, it will not be an entirely unhealthy factor. It would even be possible to put the phenomenon to good use to reduce the suffering of people with post-traumatic stress disorder, who are plagued by recurring recollections of occasions they want they may put behind them. Nader was born in Cairo, Egypt. His Coptic Christian household faced persecution at the hands of Arab nationalists and fled to Canada in 1970, when he was four years old. Many family also made the trip, so many who Nader’s girlfriend teases him concerning the "soundtrack of a thousand kisses" at massive family gatherings as people bestow customary greetings.

He attended faculty and graduate faculty on the College of Toronto, and in 1996 joined the new York College lab of Joseph LeDoux, a distinguished neuroscientist who research how feelings influence memory. "One of the things that basically seduced me about science is that it’s a system you need to use to check your personal ideas about how issues work," Nader says. Even the most cherished ideas in a given field are open to question. Scientists have long known that recording a memory requires adjusting the connections between neurons. Every memory tweaks some tiny subset of the neurons within the brain (the human mind has one hundred billion neurons in all), changing the way in which they communicate. Neurons ship messages to one another across slender gaps known as synapses. A synapse is like a bustling port, full with equipment for sending and receiving cargo-neurotransmitters, specialized chemicals that convey indicators between neurons. The entire delivery equipment is built from proteins, the essential constructing blocks of cells.