Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes problems such as access, waiting lists, healthcare protection, and numerous scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the publicly financed health care system of England, created under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, especially throughout the early 2000s, due to outbreaks of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, including over the provision of psychological healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (ultimately part of the factor for the Mental Health Act 1983), and spends too much on health center newbuilds, consisting of Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making healthcare a largely "invisible expense" to the client, healthcare seems to be successfully free to its consumers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To reduce expenses and make sure that everybody is treated equitably, there are a range of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) operates as a primary gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is typically difficult to gain greater courses of treatment, such as an appointment with a specialist. These are argued to be needed - Welshman Bevan noted in a 1948 speech in the House of Commons, "we will never have all we need ... expectations will constantly go beyond capacity". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide medical insurance systems in other nations (e.g. Germany) have actually ignored the requirement for recommendation; direct access to a specialist is possible there. [3]

There has been concern about opportunistic "health tourists" travelling to Britain (mainly London) and using the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British residents have been known to take a trip to other European nations to make the most of lower costs, and since of a fear of hospital-acquired incredibly bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS access is therefore controlled by medical top priority instead of rate system, causing waiting lists for both assessments and surgery, as much as months long, although the Labour government of 1997-onwards made it among its essential targets to reduce waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation could be two years; there were ambitions to decrease it to 18 weeks despite opposition from doctors. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical grievance is severe and dangerous, a client will reach the front of the line quickly.

The NHS measures medical need in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a method of measuring the benefit of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this method of assigning health care suggests some patients should lose in order for others to acquire, which QALY is a crude method of making life and death choices. [8]

Hospital got infections

There have been a number of fatal outbreaks of antibiotic resistant bacteria (" extremely bugs") in NHS health centers, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has actually led to criticism of requirements of hygiene across the NHS, with some patients buying private health insurance coverage or taking a trip abroad to prevent the perceived threat of catching a "incredibly bug" while in medical facility. However, the department of health pledged ₤ 50 million for a "deep clean" of all NHS England health centers in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The absence of accessibility of some treatments due to their perceived poor cost-effectiveness often causes what some call a "postcode lotto". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the very first gatekeeper, and analyze the expense efficiency of all drugs. Until they have released guidance on the cost and efficiency of new or costly medications, treatments and procedures, NHS services are unlikely to offer to money courses of treatment. The very same of real of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's equivalent in Scotland. [13]

There has been significant debate about the general public health funding of costly drugs, notably Herceptin, due to its high expense and perceived minimal general survival. The project waged by cancer victims to get the government to spend for their treatment has actually gone to the highest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it licensed. [14] [15] The House of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug companies for generating drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limitation that is considered the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the idea of personal finance effort (PFI) pertained to prominence, all new medical facility building was by convention funded from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise money and able to control public sector expenditure. In June 1994, the Capital Investment Manual (CIM) was released, setting out the regards to PFI agreements. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (building of brand-new centers) needed to take a look at whether PFI was preferable to using public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 fairly little jobs had actually been prepared for, at an overall cost of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, structures were built and serviced by the economic sector, and then leased back to the NHS. The Labour government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 embraced PFI projects, believing that public costs required to be cut. [16]

Under the personal financing effort, an increasing number of medical facilities have been developed (or rebuilt) by personal sector consortia, although the government also encouraged economic sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been substantial criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health revealing that for every ₤ 200 million invested in independently financed health centers the NHS loses 1000 doctors and nurses. The very first PFI hospitals include some 28% less beds than the ones they replaced. [18] As well as this, it has been noted that the return for construction business on PFI contracts might be as high as 58%, and that in financing health centers from the private instead of public sector cost the NHS almost half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several prominent medical scandals have happened within the NHS throughout the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised elimination, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including kids's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The main report into the event, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had purchased the "dishonest and illegal removing of every organ from every child who had had a postmortem." In response, it has been argued that the scandal brought the concern of organ and tissue donation into the general public domain, and highlighted the advantages to medical research that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s regarded opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s concerned unusually high mortality rates among patients at the hospital. [22] [23] Approximately 1200 more patients died in between 2005 and 2008 than would be anticipated for the type and size of healthcare facility [24] [25] based on figures from a mortality model, but the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be deceiving to connect the insufficient care to a particular number or series of numbers of deaths. [26] A public inquiry later revealed multiple circumstances of overlook, incompetence and abuse of patients. [27]

" Lack of independence of looking for safety and physical fitness for function"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have degenerated healthcare, NHS England is operated on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with examining if the care provided by the NHS is truly safe and in shape for purpose is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC explains itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in fact "accountable to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its financing originates from the taxpayer. A minimum of one chairman, one president [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have actually been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is therefore the potential for a conflict of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the very same leadership and both are extremely susceptible to political interference.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins urged NHS England to focus on evidence and safety in gender dysphoria treatment following issues raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult centers and initiated an evaluation, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum slammed constraints on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall welcomed the evaluation's concentrate on kids's wellness. [28] [29]

See also

National Health Service
List of health centers in England
Healthcare in the United Kingdom
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the original on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: outcomes of a regular data analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher rules to guarantee that people do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health tourists might get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors assault Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do health centers make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleaning under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lotto'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug rejected for NHS use". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the initial on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to carry out thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI healthcare facilities 'costing NHS additional ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances needed for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport health center deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog says". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'must be criminal offense'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have led to 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford health center scandal: As much as 1,200 might have passed away over "shocking" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How numerous individuals passed away "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit medical facility gets away interrogation". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister tells NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult centers". . 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England should end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.