An Old Parliamentary Discussion About Neon Signs > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Not every day does one stumble upon a discussion as intriguing as this, neon lights but I recently had the pleasure of revisiting a particularly fascinating discussion from 1930, which took place in the House of Commons. The subject? The growing issue of neon signage—specifically those red and green ones outside shops and factories situated near busy roads. At the time, these signs were causing a lot of confusion for motorists. Why? Because they were so strikingly similar to the automatic traffic signals that motorists used to guide them.

This sparked a heated debate, where Captain Hudson, the Minister of Transport at the time, pointed out the powers granted under Section 48 (4) of the Road Traffic Act, 1930. Under this provision, local highway authorities had the right to demand the removal of any sign or object that could be mistaken for a traffic signal. In theory, this would prevent the confusion caused by neon signs in close proximity busy roads. However, as you can imagine, the matter was not as straightforward as it appeared.

In the House, Captain Sir William Brass raised a good question: "Who, may I ask, is the judge of what is or isn’t confusing? he inquired. To this, Captain Hudson responded that it would be up to the highway authority's decision to decide that. This raised the question of consistency—would each area take a different approach? Mr. Morgan Jones, ever the inquiring mind, then asked whether the Ministry of Transport had had enough data on this particular issue.

After all, with the rise of electric signs, surely the Ministry should have research and a policy in place to deal with the confusion caused by these bright signs. Captain Hudson, in a polite yet firm response, reiterated that this matter was not within the direct remit of the Ministry. He explained that it was for local authorities to take the appropriate action, and that his superior was already looking into it. Yet, Mr. Jones raised another question: should not the Minister of Transport take a more active role in ensuring consistency?

This is where the debate really hit its stride—should it be left to local authorities to tackle it, or should the Minister step in to ensure a cohesive, nationwide solution to a problem that seemed to be causing growing confusion? Ultimately, Captain Hudson admitted that the matter was indeed causing difficulty, though he deferred to the Ministry’s internal discussions for a more decisive plan. He suggested that the situation would be closely monitored, but as yet, no firm action had been taken.

What is most striking about this debate, looking back, is how such a minor matter—electric signage—could spark such a substantial discussion in Parliament. While today we may take these kinds of discussions for granted, it was a time when new technology—even something as simple as new signage—could create ripple effects across society.

If you loved this short article and you would like to receive more information with regards to retro LED signs kindly visit the site.