Criticism of the National Health Service (England) > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) includes issues such as gain access to, waiting lists, healthcare coverage, and different scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly funded healthcare system of England, produced under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour government of Clement Attlee. It has actually come under much criticism, particularly during the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the participation of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, consisting of over the provision of mental healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the factor for the Mental Health Act 1983), and spends beyond your means on medical facility newbuilds, consisting of Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making healthcare a largely "invisible expense" to the client, health care appears to be effectively complimentary to its customers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To reduce costs and make sure that everyone is dealt with equitably, there are a variety of "gatekeepers." The general professional (GP) operates as a primary gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is often impossible to get greater courses of treatment, such as a consultation with a specialist. These are argued to be needed - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in the House of Commons, "we shall never have all we need ... expectations will constantly go beyond capacity". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide health insurance coverage systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have ignored the requirement for referral; direct access to a professional is possible there. [3]

There has actually been concern about opportunistic "health travelers" taking a trip to Britain (primarily London) and utilizing the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British citizens have been known to travel to other European countries to take advantage of lower costs, and since of a fear of hospital-acquired very bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS gain access to is for that reason managed by medical priority rather than cost system, resulting in waiting lists for both consultations and surgical treatment, as much as months long, although the Labour government of 1997-onwards made it one of its key targets to reduce waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation might be two years; there were aspirations to lower it to 18 weeks despite opposition from physicians. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical complaint is severe and lethal, a patient will reach the front of the line rapidly.

The NHS determines medical requirement in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a method of measuring the benefit of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this technique of designating health care means some clients should lose in order for others to acquire, and that QALY is a crude approach of making life and death decisions. [8]

Hospital got infections

There have actually been numerous fatal outbreaks of antibiotic resistant germs (" extremely bugs") in NHS health centers, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has actually caused criticism of standards of health across the NHS, with some clients buying personal health insurance or travelling abroad to avoid the viewed danger of catching a "super bug" while in healthcare facility. However, the department of health vowed ₤ 50 million for a "deep clean" of all NHS England hospitals in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The lack of accessibility of some treatments due to their perceived poor cost-effectiveness often results in what some call a "postcode lottery". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the first gatekeeper, and analyze the expense efficiency of all drugs. Until they have actually provided guidance on the cost and effectiveness of brand-new or expensive medicines, treatments and procedures, NHS services are unlikely to offer to money courses of treatment. The exact same of real of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's equivalent in Scotland. [13]

There has been significant debate about the public health funding of costly drugs, significantly Herceptin, due to its high cost and perceived limited general survival. The campaign waged by cancer patients to get the federal government to spend for their treatment has actually gone to the greatest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it licensed. [14] [15] The House of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug companies for bringing in drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limitation that is considered the maximum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the concept of personal finance effort (PFI) concerned prominence, all brand-new hospital structure was by convention funded from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise cash and able to control public sector expense. In June 1994, the Capital Expense Manual (CIM) was released, setting out the terms of PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (structure of brand-new facilities) needed to look at whether PFI was more effective to utilizing public sector financing. By the end of 1995, 60 fairly little projects had been planned for, at an overall expense of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, buildings were constructed and serviced by the economic sector, and after that leased back to the NHS. The Labour federal government chosen under Tony Blair in 1997 welcomed PFI projects, thinking that public costs needed to be curtailed. [16]

Under the private financing initiative, an increasing number of hospitals have been built (or rebuilt) by private sector consortia, although the federal government also encouraged personal sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been significant criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy business which works for the Department of Health revealing that for each ₤ 200 million invested in privately financed hospitals the NHS loses 1000 medical professionals and nurses. The first PFI health centers contain some 28% fewer beds than the ones they changed. [18] In addition to this, it has actually been noted that the return for building and construction business on PFI contracts could be as high as 58%, which in funding medical facilities from the personal instead of public sector cost the NHS almost half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several high-profile medical scandals have actually taken place within the NHS over the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including kids's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The official report into the occurrence, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had ordered the "dishonest and prohibited stripping of every organ from every child who had had a postmortem." In action, it has been argued that the scandal brought the problem of organ and tissue contribution into the general public domain, and highlighted the benefits to medical research study that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s concerned opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s concerned abnormally high death rates amongst clients at the healthcare facility. [22] [23] As much as 1200 more patients died in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of hospital [24] [25] based upon figures from a mortality model, however the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be deceiving to link the insufficient care to a specific number or range of numbers of deaths. [26] A public query later revealed numerous instances of disregard, incompetence and abuse of clients. [27]

" Lack of self-reliance of looking for safety and fitness for purpose"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have actually devolved healthcare, NHS England is on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with inspecting if the care provided by the NHS is genuinely safe and suitable for purpose is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC explains itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it is in fact "liable to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its funding comes from the taxpayer. A minimum of one chairman, one president [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is for that reason the capacity for a conflict of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the very same leadership and both are highly prone to political disturbance.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins advised NHS England to prioritize proof and security in gender dysphoria treatment following concerns raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult clinics and started a review, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum criticized restrictions on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall welcomed the review's focus on kids's wellness. [28] [29]

See also

National Health Service
List of hospitals in England
Healthcare in the United Kingdom
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the original on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: results of a routine data analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher guidelines to guarantee that people do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health tourists might get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors assault Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the initial on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do medical facilities make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleansing under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lotto'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the initial on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug declined for NHS usage". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to perform thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the original on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI healthcare facilities 'costing NHS additional ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances required for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport hospital deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, guard dog says". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding mistakes 'must be criminal offence'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have resulted in 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford hospital scandal: Approximately 1,200 may have passed away over "shocking" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How numerous people died "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit healthcare facility leaves interrogation". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult clinics". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England should end 'culture of secrecy' in kids's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our health care. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.