The concept of a tutor gogogocheck having sex with his/her trainees is something that has constantly been considered as a taboo in the culture. > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

The concept of a tutor having sex with his/her trainees is something that has constantly been considered as a taboo in the culture. It is something that is prohibited, something that goes against the standards and values that we have actually established for ourselves. Yet is it truly as taboo as we believe it is?

There are several cases where an instructor has gone across the line and made love with their pupil. This is not just ethically incorrect but additionally illegal as it is a clear abuse of power. The teacher is intended to be a coach, a guide, an instructor gogogocheck and not a lover. The teacher is meant to show, not to benefit from the pupil's vulnerability.

What happens when the teacher is not just showing the curriculum however also teaches the various other thing? What takes place when the educator that is expected to be a role model ends up being a good example for another thing as well? This is the motif of the preferred grown-up web content which portrays the tutor as the sexual predator.

This content is a clear indicator of just how individuals's assumption of this taboo is altering. It shows that people are currently more open up to the concept of a teacher making love with a trainee. It shows that people are currently more approving of the concept of a teacher being a sexual being.

It does not mean that the educator's sexual relationship with the student is acceptable. It does not imply that the teacher's power imbalance is not a problem.

Is it a taboo or is it fact? One point is for sure; this taboo is slowly yet undoubtedly coming to be a fact in the globe of adult material.


The teacher is expected to be an advisor, a guide, a teacher and not a fan. What happens when the educator that is meant to be a duty model ends up being a function model for something else? It shows that people are now more approving of the idea of an instructor being a sexual being.

It does not imply that the instructor's sexual partnership with the pupil is appropriate.